"Powiedziałbym, że 30% szans, że to jest dno, a 70%, że czeka nas jeszcze jeden błysk. Dlaczego? Ponieważ dopiero teraz zsuwamy się poniżej 200 tygodni, okej? Tutaj mieliśmy trochę początkowego wsparcia, teraz zsuwamy się poniżej, i uh, tak, kiedy zsuwasz się poniżej znaczącej średniej ruchomej, znaczącego wsparcia, uh, w większości przypadków prowadzi to do błysku." "I would say 30% that this is the bottom and then 70% that we have another flash. Why? Because we're just now sliding below 200 week, okay? Here we got a bit of initial support, now we're sliding down below, and uh yeah, when you slide down below a significant moving average, a significant support, uh it is in most cases leading to flash."
To twierdzenie oczekuje na weryfikację.
Wyłącznie w celach informacyjnych. Nie stanowi porady inwestycyjnej, finansowej, prawnej ani podatkowej. Pełne zastrzeżenia
… I think he is uh fantastic. But the fact that we are now sliding down below 200 week, I feel that uh the likelihood of us going a bit lower than than this uh 58 low is quite big. Now, would it surprise me if uh this is the bottom and we don't go below it? It wouldn't surprise me, but I think it's more unlikely, you know? It's uh it's uh I would say >> 30% that this is the bottom and then 70% that we have another flash. Why? Because we're just now sliding below 200 week, okay? Here we got a bit of initial support, now we're sliding down below, and uh yeah, when you slide down below a significant moving average, a significant support, uh it is in most cases leading to >> flash. So, not always. Again, everything is probabilistic. I don't know what's going to happen exactly, but I can tell you with 70% chance we have uh sliding lower uh and the likelihood of another uh red candle here somewhere uh to towards the middle of the buy zone. But big shout to Bob Lucas, he's been very very good in his uh in his approach to …
Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z tej funkcji
Zaloguj