Skip to content
Verdiktum

That it was similar in terms of water, in terms of atmosphere, that is certain....

Piotr Kosek: "That it was similar in terms of water, in terms of atmosphere, that is certain. We know that today." — True

P

📅 22.04.2026 · Znaleźliśmy budulec życia na Marsie? Skąd się tam wziął... · 👁️ 3

True. The claim is true. Numerous scientific studies and space missions have provided convincing evidence that in the distant past, Mars had liquid water on its surface, including rivers, lakes, and even oceans. It has also be...

"That it was similar in terms of water, in terms of atmosphere, that is certain. We know that today." "To, że była podobna pod względem wody, pod względem atmosfery, to jest pewne. To już wiemy dzisiaj."
🌐 (Machine-translated — original in Polish) · Original in Polishuage
Factual claim 🔹 Other AI assessment confidence: 100% Source on YouTube

Predictions closed

Source (proof)

Plays from the quoted moment

Verification

Analysis generated with AI Pro
Available in the Pro plan Full AI analysis, sources, counterarguments Unlock Pro
🤖
AI-generated analysis: This result is an assessment by a language model, not an expert opinion or a legally binding verdict. Verify sources before making any decisions. Model: gemini-2.5-flash

For informational purposes only. Not investment, financial, legal or tax advice. Full disclaimer

AI is analyzing your argument…

Community Arguments (AI Feedback)

Log in to use this feature

Login

Transcript excerpt

Oryginał w języku Polskim Open on YouTube

Ale być może jeżeli znajdujemy w różnych miejscach faktycznie geologicznie też od siebie różnych takie ślady, to jeśli one pochodzą faktycznie od jakiegoś starożytnego życia, to musiało być one rozsiane po planecie. A to już zaczyna nam tworzyć obraz Marsa jako być może kiedyś planety podobnej bardziej do Ziemi niż nam się wydaje, bo to, że była podobna pod względem wody, pod względem atmosfery, to jest pewne. To już wiemy dzisiaj. Yyy, to znaczy inaczej, no jakby nic nie jest pewne, oczywiście nie byliśmy, nie widzieliśmy, ale jest bardzo mało jakichś takich poszlak, które wskazywałyby na to, że tak nie było. Tak, więcej pokazuje nam, że ta woda tam była. Widzimy dokładnie takie same wyżłobienia terenu, jakie tworzy woda na Ziemi. Tak, chociażby Vales Marineris, tak? Ten ol

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!

Sign in to leave a comment.

Related claims by Piotr Kosek

Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 25.03.2026
Failed
"We will not wait another six decades for confirmation of which candidate is the correct one. In March 2026, the Indian orbiter Chandrayaan 2 will fly directly over the selected area. This flight is part of an ongoing lunar surface mapping project, so that in the future we know where everything is. "
translated PL · original
🔮 Forecast Technology 2026
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 05.06.2026
True
"the results delighted everyone, because the material obtained in the laboratory showed a powerful drop in shear wave velocity and a Poisson's ratio perfectly consistent with actual seismic measurements of the Earth's exterior. So, undeniable experimental evidence confirming the superionic nature of the core appeared before us. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
True
"Combining lensing data with supernova data, scientists calculated that the chance of this gigantic discrepancy in results being a mere random fluke or some statistical error is less than 1 in 10 million. The crisis has become a fact, and the Hubble tension has become a real problem in physics. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
! Misleading
"An international team of scientists working with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument known as Desi has published the results of their monumental research on the evolution of the cosmos using baryonic acoustic oscillations. When these extremely accurate maps of cosmic structures were combined with those known from cosmic microwave background radiation and traditional supernovae, scientists obtained a clear and unambiguous signal. Dark energy is not a constant value. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other