Skip to content
Verdiktum

the frog, as a diamagnetic, became an opposing magnet that repelled at 16 Teslas...

Piotr Kosek: "the frog, as a diamagnetic, became an opposing magnet that repelled at 16 Teslas with exactly the same force as the force of gravity" — True

P

📅 19.04.2026 · Fizycy sprawili, że żaba zaczęła lewitować - POP Scienc... · 👁️ 2

True. The claim is true. In 1997, physicist Andre Geim conducted an experiment in which he levitated a live frog in a strong magnetic field. The frog, being diamagnetic (mainly due to its water content), generated a magnetic f...

"the frog, as a diamagnetic, became an opposing magnet that repelled at 16 Teslas with exactly the same force as the force of gravity" "żaba stała się jako ten diamagnetyk stała się takim przeciwnym magnesem, który odpychał przy 16 Teslach dokładnie z taką siłą jak siła jak siła grawitacji"
🌐 (Machine-translated — original in Polish) · Original in Polishuage
Factual claim 🔹 Other AI assessment confidence: 100% 🌍 Global Source on YouTube

Predictions closed

Source (proof)

Plays from the quoted moment

Verification

Analysis generated with AI Pro
Available in the Pro plan Full AI analysis, sources, counterarguments Unlock Pro
🤖
AI-generated analysis: This result is an assessment by a language model, not an expert opinion or a legally binding verdict. Verify sources before making any decisions. Model: gemini-2.5-flash

For informational purposes only. Not investment, financial, legal or tax advice. Full disclaimer

AI is analyzing your argument…

Community Arguments (AI Feedback)

Log in to use this feature

Login

Transcript excerpt

Oryginał w języku Polskim Open on YouTube

Naprawdę to jest bardzo duże pole magnetyczne. I ta żaba nie doznawszy jakiegoś takiego nagłego i silnego, zauważalnego defektu na swoim umyśle, jeśli można uznać te odruchy żaby i ich kształt za coś, co pokazuje nam jak żaba funkcjonuje, ona poruszała się tak w tym polu magnetycznym, jednocześnie lewitując. Czyli stworzono stworzono, żaba stała się jako ten diamagnetyk stała się takim przeciwnym magnesem, który odpychał przy 16 Teslach >> dokładnie z taką siłą jak siła jak siła grawitacji >> jak siła grawitacji, czyli no te są z jednej strony horendalnie duże pola magnetyczne. Czy to jak to liczyć? No bo teraz tak, o, czekaj, bo to sobie przyczepiłem. O, to teraz czuję. >> Ja bym tutaj, >> tu mamy tutaj. Żaba by mogła, znaczy, bo inaczej, bo musimy jeszcze jedną rzecz wziąć pod uwagę, że co innego jest położyć żabę na magnesie,

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first!

Sign in to leave a comment.

Related claims by Piotr Kosek

Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 25.03.2026
Failed
"We will not wait another six decades for confirmation of which candidate is the correct one. In March 2026, the Indian orbiter Chandrayaan 2 will fly directly over the selected area. This flight is part of an ongoing lunar surface mapping project, so that in the future we know where everything is. "
translated PL · original
🔮 Forecast Technology 2026
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 05.06.2026
True
"the results delighted everyone, because the material obtained in the laboratory showed a powerful drop in shear wave velocity and a Poisson's ratio perfectly consistent with actual seismic measurements of the Earth's exterior. So, undeniable experimental evidence confirming the superionic nature of the core appeared before us. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
True
"Combining lensing data with supernova data, scientists calculated that the chance of this gigantic discrepancy in results being a mere random fluke or some statistical error is less than 1 in 10 million. The crisis has become a fact, and the Hubble tension has become a real problem in physics. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other
Piotr Kosek Piotr Kosek 12.06.2026
! Misleading
"An international team of scientists working with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument known as Desi has published the results of their monumental research on the evolution of the cosmos using baryonic acoustic oscillations. When these extremely accurate maps of cosmic structures were combined with those known from cosmic microwave background radiation and traditional supernovae, scientists obtained a clear and unambiguous signal. Dark energy is not a constant value. "
translated PL · original
✅ Factual claim Other