"Nie, nie, nie, nie. Jesteśmy tylko agentem, agenci, agenci doprowadzą nas do setki. Och, tak. Ale ja nie, to bilion T. [1694s] Tak, to jest to, że myślimy, że będzie tysiące bilionów, a nie dziesiątki czy setki, w ciągu najbliższych 5 do 10 lat, wykonanych przez autonomicznych agentów. Tysiące bilionów." "No, no, no, no. We're just the agent the agents the agents are going to bring us to the 100. Oh, yeah. But I No, that's a trillion T. [1694s] Yeah, that's a that's we think that they're going to be thousands of trillions, not tens or hundreds, within the next 5 to 10 years done by autonomous agents. Thousands of trillions."

… And it's not always right, but it's a lot better than what we have now, which is nothing. You can't you can't bet on that specific outcome, right? On in in terms of, you know, the caterpillar example. >> I know we got to run in a second, but and just interestingly, you know, 10T to 50T. We always joke, you know, next should be a 100T. >> No, no, no, no. We're just the agent the agents the agents are going to bring us to the 100. >> Oh, yeah. But I No, that's a trillion T. Yeah, that's a that's we think that they're going to be thousands of trillions, not tens or hundreds, within the next 5 to 10 years done by autonomous agents. Thousands of trillions. So, you know, when I hear some of the traditional Trout Five banks talk about, you know, some of the things they're doing, they're years away from even acknowledging that fact. They're here now. Five years ago, they weren't here. There was no JP Morgan and City Bank here five years ago. >> Um I think they're >> they're which is it is fine. I think they …

---